All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED QUALIFICATION THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
National Certificate: Polygraphy |
SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
59258 | National Certificate: Polygraphy | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
Task Team - Polygraphy | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
SAS SETA - Safety and Security SETA | OQSF - Occupational Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
National Certificate | Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | ||
ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
Undefined | 120 | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Regular-Unit Stds Based |
REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
SAQA 06120/18 | 2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
Purpose:
The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 will equip learners to undertake industrial and legislative enquiries or investigations. It will upgrade the standard of polygraphy training and testing in South Africa and provide a necessary standard for the development and assessment of polygraphy courses. The focus of the National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 is the ethical administration and interpretation of polygraph examinations. Learners are expected to understand the main areas of polygraphy, including an understanding of the key terms, concepts, facts, established principles, rules, theories and origins. They are required to select and apply standard methods, procedures, and/or techniques of polygraphy within a supported environment. Learners should be capable of identifying, evaluating and solving defined, routine and new problems within a familiar context, and to applying solutions based on relevant evidence and procedures and/or other forms of explanation. They are expected to act in accordance with organisational ethical codes of conduct, values and practices and to seek guidance on ethical and professional issues where necessary. They are required to gather information from a range of sources, to select information appropriate to the task, and to apply basic processes of analysis, synthesis and evaluation on that information. They require an ability to communicate information reliably, accurately and coherently, using conventions appropriate to polygraphy, either in writing, verbally or in practical demonstration, including an understanding of and respect for conventions around intellectual property, copyright and plagiarism. The purpose of the Qualification is to: The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 will be useful for: Rationale: The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 was developed at the request of the polygraph industry as there is an urgent need for accredited training for polygraphers. In the 1980's most South African polygraphers were trained in Israel. Post 1994 many polygraphers previously employed by Government went into private practice. Most new learners in the field were trained in the United States of America (USA) where training is governed by Federal and State legislation. From 1998, two American Schools offered polygraph training courses in South Africa based on the American Curriculum. The training does not take into account the issues of diversity which are significant features of the South African situation and learners are required to contextualise and apply their learning to the South African situation themselves. The American training is very expensive and beyond the reach of most South Africans. Polygraph Examinations are increasingly being used in both the public and private sectors to protect economic activities and maintain security. There are polygraphers in the Statutory Intelligence Services and both the Public and the Private Sector make use of polygraphers for, among other things, employment and security screening, and as part of investigations into financial loss and sexual harassment. Polygraphers are required to testify in a number of dispute resolution bodies including the Council for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), the Labour Court and in District and Regional Courts in respect of bail applications and confessions during polygraphy examinations. There are very few trained Black polygraphers in South Africa and this Qualification will provide access to the industry to people who are able to conduct polygraph examinations in the various official languages without the use of interpreters. Correctional Services will, in the near future, use polygraph examinations in association with correctional release conditions. This has implications for the number of new polygraphers that will be needed across the provinces. South African Polygraph examiners often work in other countries in Africa and there is a growing need in the South African Development Community (SADC) for well trained polygraphers. The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 is essential for the regulation of training in an industry that is based on ethical principles and where there is currently no legislation or other form of governance. At present there are short courses for polygraphers, but no Qualification. The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 is a first step towards accredited training and future governance of the industry. Representatives of both the Polygraphy Association of South Africa and the South African Professional Polygraphy Association have indicated that once there is a Qualification registered on the NQF they intend approaching the relevant Minister with a view to regulating the profession. The learning pathway for learners in Polygraphy: It is anticipated that learners who wish to become polygraphers will have a first degree preferably with psychology, physiology, forensic science or criminology as a subject. The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 will provide the occupational competencies required to operate in the industry. There are two routes for learners who wish to qualify as polygraphers: > B degree in Criminology, Forensic Science, Physiology, Human Resources, Psychology or Law. > National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5. > National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 6. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy, NQF Level 4.
Recognition of Prior Learning: Access to the Qualification: |
RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
Y |
QUALIFICATION RULES |
A minimum of 120 credits are required to complete the Qualification which is made up of the following components:
Total: 120 credits. Fundamental Component: There are nineteen credits designated as fundamental for the purpose of this qualification. These address communication skills and study skills as a means of scaffolding learning for the research required and understanding of democracy and investigative interviewing that are fundamental to the learning required for this qualification. All the Unit Standards designated as Fundamental are compulsory. Core Component: Seventy credits have been allocated to Unit Standards designated as Core for the purpose of this Qualification, which ensures that the qualification has a strong polygraphy focus. These Unit Standards provide the knowledge, competencies and skills related to polygraph examinations as well as knowledge and understanding of human behaviour, physiology, knowledge of the industry in both the South African and international contexts and issues of ethics and legislation necessary for people who conduct polygraph examinations to detect deception. All the Unit Standards indicated as Core are compulsory. Elective Component: Electives that add up to at least thirty one credits should be selected from the Unit Standards listed as electives or from other qualifications if they relate directly to the learner's work context. The Electives provide opportunities for the holistic development of the learner provide for maximum flexibility and multi-skilling and allow learners to achieve a qualification that is relevant to the context in which they work: |
EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
The Exit Level Outcomes and their Associated Assessment Criteria are the following, which means that the learner will be able to:
1. Apply a polygraph examination process. 2. Substantiate a specialist opinion as to whether or not an individual displays an indication of deception. 3. Demonstrate knowledge and application of ethical conduct in the polygraph examination process. 4. Collect interpret, analyse, synthesise, evaluate and present information related to a polygraph examination. 5. Communicate effectively in a polygraph examination context. The Critical Cross-Field Outcomes: Before The National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 is awarded, learners are required to demonstrate competence in the required Unit Standards and complete a summative assessment based on the Exit Outcomes of the Qualification. Experienced polygraphers could request Recognition of Prior Learning against the Exit Level Outcomes of the Qualification and could achieve the Qualification by completing a summative assessment based on the Exit Outcomes. |
ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5: Integrated Assessment: Assessment practices must be fair, transparent, valid and reliable and should ensure that no learner is disadvantaged. Learners who wish to be assessed against the competencies in the Qualification and/or associated Unit Standards should direct enquiries to the relevant ETQA. The focus of assessment must be on the assessment of the learning outcomes rather than learning outputs. The Specific Outcomes guide the learning and training process towards the outcomes on a continuous basis. The purpose is to determine whether the outcomes have been attained. Situations should present a wide range of options. Applications should require significant choices from a wide range of procedures and in a number of contexts. Learning, teaching and assessment are inextricably linked. Where appropriate, assessment of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values indicated in the various Unit Standards should be integrated. Assessment has a formative monitoring function. Formative assessment should be used to assess gaps in the learners' skill and knowledge and to indicate where there is a need for expanded opportunities. The goal is to promote learning and to assess the efficacy of the teaching and learning process. Feedback from assessment informs teaching and learning and allows for the critique of outcomes, methodology and materials. Formative assessment is diagnostic and as such it should guide the learner and the trainer. It is continuous and is used to plan appropriate learning experiences to meet the learner's needs. It provides information about problems experienced at different stages in the learning process. As it is criterion referenced, if the learner has met the assessment criteria, he/she has achieved the outcomes. Assessment should also have a summative component. Summative assessment may be used on completion of a Unit Standard, but should not be the only form of assessment. Assessment should take place in an authentic context as far as is possible. A variety of methods must be used in assessment and tools and activities must be appropriate to the context in which the learner is working. Where it is not possible to assess competence in the workplace, simulations, case studies and other similar techniques should be used to provide a context appropriate to the assessment. Integration implies that theoretical and practical components should, where possible, be assessed together. Integrative techniques should be used to assess applied competence. Learners should be required to demonstrate that they can perform the outcomes with understanding and insight. Assessment should ensure that all Specific Outcomes, embedded knowledge and Critical Cross-Field Outcomes are evaluated. Assessment of the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes should be integrated with the assessment of the Specific Outcomes. The Critical Cross-Field Outcomes are implicit in some Unit Standards and programmes should be designed to extend and further reflect the integration. |
INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
The USA and Israel are regarded as leaders in the field for training of Polygraph professionals. Numerous polygraph schools and associations exist internationally with one common accreditation requirement: that is to be accredited through the American Polygraph Association (APA). Most of these sites do not list the standards for qualifying polygraph examiners.
The qualification authorities of the UK, New Zealand and Australia were also researched but no standards were found. The report that follows indicates all the sites researched, the associations contacted, feedback received as well as course overviews. In some cases Curricula were sourced that facilitated this comparison. Notes: Americanized spelling is used where material is quoted from American sources]. International Standard: The current international standard is a ten-week course presented under the auspices of the American Polygraph Association. Standards of practice are set by the American Standards for Materials and Techniques (ASTM). This is the leading professional body internationally. The Department of Defence in the USA has a 14 week polygraph course followed by a three-month internship to train Federal Government Polygraphers. Polygraph examinations are conducted in at least 69 countries. American Polygraph Association (APA): Established in 1966, the American Polygraph Association (APA) consists of over 2500 members dedicated to providing a valid and reliable means to verify the truth and establish the highest standards of moral, ethical, and professional conduct in the polygraph field. The American Polygraph Association is the leading polygraph professional association, establishing standards of ethical practices, techniques, instrumentation, research, and advanced training and continuing educational programs. Mr. Donald Krapohl, President of the American Polygraph Association responded very favourably to the proposed South African Polygraphy Qualification as follows, "I congratulate you for the excellent drafts of polygraph instruction standards you sent. They are thorough and well conceived. I have made a few minor edits and suggestions to the drafts, which are attached to this e-mail". He also verified that the current international standard is a ten-week course presented under the auspices of the American Polygraph Association. Standards of practice are set by the American Standards for Materials and Techniques (ASTM). The Department of Defence in the United States of America (USA) has a 14-week polygraph course to train Federal Government Polygraphers, followed by a three-month internship. Polygraph examinations are conducted in at least 69 countries. The following comparison is based on courses accredited through the American Polygraph Association (APA) as these appear to represent the APA standards: International Associations: The Global Association of Security and Polygraph is an International Association and is the world's largest Security Association for Security Service Professionals/Organizations, Private investigators/Agencies, Polygraph examiners & all other Professionals providing services or products in the field of Civilian Security & loss prevention. It was formed to inter-alia: This organisation based in Kyiv, Ukraine, is a voluntary professional polygraph association composed of highly qualified polygraph examiners in the private, law enforcement and government sectors from around the world, determined to protect the public by verifying the truth. Working at the international level, the ILPE is dedicated to providing a valid and reliable means of verifying the truth, and advancing and defending lie detection as a scientific discipline and profession serving the public good. The ILPE assures the highest level of professionalism among polygraph examiners by establishing standards of ethical practices, techniques and instrumentation, as well as providing polygraph school accreditation and continuing polygraph education. The ILPE is committed to educating the public about the positive impact and benefits of the polygraph. In order to become an ILPE member, a polygraph examiner must graduate from an ILPE and/or an APA (American Polygraph Association) accredited polygraph school, and utilise ILPE and/or APA approved polygraph instrumentation meeting strict international quality standards. The ILPE governs the conduct of its members by requiring adherence to the ILPE Code of Ethics and a set of ILPE Standards of Practice. A.S.I.T. is accredited by American Polygraph Association (APA) and the American Association of Police Polygraphists (AAPP). Since 1980 The Academy for Scientific Investigative Training has educated law enforcement, government, security and private sector personnel from around the world in best practice polygraph, interview and interrogation techniques. Directed by two forensic experts known across the globe for their best-selling reference, Effective Interviewing & Interrogation Techniques, the Academy offers three levels of polygraph instruction. For certified polygraph examiners, A.S.I.T. offers advanced training and continuing education that meets American Polygraph Association requirements for certification. United Kingdom and Europe: This is the largest organisation of its type in Britain and the European Union. BPA governs the conduct of its members by requiring adherence to a Code of Ethics and a set of Standards and Principles of Practice. In order to become a BPA member, examiners must adhere to strict guidelines and educational requirements that include hundreds of hours of coursework at an accredited school, as well as an internship. BPA members must acquire continuing education and training in order to maintain membership. All members of the British Polygraph Association have graduated from a training organisation accredited by the American Polygraph Association. This ensures: Australasia: The NTIS provides a search and browse function that allows one to find specific registered Australian Training Packages, Qualifications, Courses, Units of Competency and Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) that are licensed to provide training in one or many The Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society Inc. The Australian Forensic Science Society was formed in 1971 with the aim of bringing together scientists, police, criminalists, pathologists, and members of the legal profession actively involved with the forensic sciences. The Society's objectives are to enhance the quality of Forensic Science providing both formal and informal lectures, discussions and demonstrations encompassing the various disciplines within the science. It was decided in 1988 that the Australian Forensic Society should recognise its New Zealand members and changed its name to the Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society (ANZFSS). Its primary function is to coordinate the administration and quality assurance of national qualifications in New Zealand. The New Zealand Framework had various sub-fields under the domain law and security but no qualifications or standards could be assessed relating to polygraphy. APS training is based in Melbourne, Australia and specialises in conducting in-house training programs for corporate clients throughout the world. The behavioural interviewing courses offered by APS Training are designed to provide attendees with dynamic and effective interviewing skills that get results. Conducting effective interviews is a critical process in weeding out those people that may have fabricated, embellished or omitted information. The training is directed at anyone involved in managing people, recruitment, government authorities, financial reporting services at all levels, investigators, customs, police workplace relations, human resource personnel, legal firms, banks, executives, auditors, risk management, fund managers, organisations large and small. This training is not aimed at polygraphers and no schools exist in Australia for the training of polygraphers who go to the USA for training. Israel: The Institute is one of the largest private polygraph institutes in the world, administering thousands of polygraph tests per year to public and civil sectors. The Horowitz Institute has worked in Western Europe, Russia, Latin America and South Africa. Most courses and organisations sourced align with the American Polygraph association (APA) Standards, and are accredited through this body. All the courses sourced indicate their course outcomes are APA accredited which provides some idea of the international standard for this comparison. Whilst their course brochures are not detailed enough for a full comparison every effort has been made to check for synergies and gaps in the proposed South African National Certificate in Polygraphy, NQF Level 5. Course selected for comparison are: Detailed Comparison: Academy for Scientific Investigative Training (ASIT) (USA Based With an Office in Egypt): Forensic Psychophysiology Course Outline (Eight Classroom Weeks 320 Hours/Post Graduate Work 80 Hours): Note: Only generalised conclusions can be made about the outcomes of the Academy for Scientific Investigative Training workshop (indicated in bold font) as these are not formulated as outcomes in the way that South Africa records specific outcomes. The course is a 400-hour course with 44 hours of practical work at the end of the theoretical section. Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Comparison with South African Qualification: The Unit Standard, Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the methodology of polygraphy testing, has the Specific Outcomes: Learners who are competent in this Unit Standard would be competent in the polygraph process at a greater depth and breadth required in the ASIT training and up to date on any of the newest techniques selected by the provider. Some of the interviewing techniques indicated in the ASIT course such as Reid, Arther, Marcy and Positive Control are no longer used in South Africa. The earlier techniques are included in the Unit Standard Research the origins and use of polygraphy. Comparison with South African Qualification: Interviewing is thoroughly covered in the South African Unit Standards: > Specific Outcome 2: Discuss different interview techniques used in polygraph testing. > Specific Outcome 3: Construct questions for use in polygraph testing. > Specific Outcome 4: Investigate the use of different test formats. > Specific Outcome 2: Interview an examinee or suspect. Comparison with South African Qualification: Formulating questions is thoroughly covered in the South African Unit Standards: Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: > Research ethical and international trends in polygraphy. > Research the origins and use of polygraphy. > Quality assure a polygraph process. Synergies with South African Qualification: > Quality Assure a polygraph process. > Conduct a polygraph examination. > Analyse the facts and context of an incident in order to make a decision relating to polygraph examinations. > Apply a polygraph examination process. > Substantiate a specialist opinion as to whether or not an individual displays an indication of deception. > Demonstrate knowledge and application of ethical conduct in the polygraph examination process. > Collect interpret, analyse, synthesise, evaluate and present information related to a polygraph examination. > Communicate effectively in a polygraph examination context. Synergies with South African Qualification: > Demonstrate knowledge and application of efficient study skills. > Present an informed argument on a current issue in a business sector. > Research ethical and international trends in polygraphy. > Research the origins and use of polygraphy. Overall comparison with the ASIT training: Learners who are competent in the National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 will be competent in the polygraph process and related knowledge, skills and competencies at a greater depth and breadth than is required in the ASIT training. They will have been exposed to attitudes and values aligned to the South African Constitution and an African context and will be aware of issues of diversity that influence polygraph examinations. The ASIT course is a 400-hour course with 44 hours of practical work at the end of the theoretical section. The South African Qualification requires 1200 hours of notional time that integrates theory and practice. It appears that the South African Qualification covers all aspects included in the ASIT training and has the advantage of being contextualised for an African situation. The major differences relate to the application of outcomes based education and integration of theory and practice. This Polygraph Examiner's Course consists of up to 394 hours of intensive classroom and laboratory study. The course is designed to insure the graduate will be a competent polygraph examiner, equipped with the knowledge necessary to conduct conclusive polygraph examinations in a professional and ethical manner. The major subjects taught are as follows: Notes: The main topics of Training Curriculum for the Arizona School of Polygraph Science are indicated in bold font. The outline is in insufficient detail to allow for a full comparison to the specific outcomes only generalised conclusions can be made. Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Comparison with South African Qualification: > Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the methodology of polygraphy testing, specifically in Specific Outcome 3: Develop questions for a polygraph format. > Conduct a polygraph examination, Specific Outcome 3: Develop questions for a specific polygraph test format. Comparison with South African Qualification: > Explain the phases in the polygraph process. > Discuss different interview techniques used in polygraph examinations. > Construct questions used in polygraph examinations. > Investigate the use of different test formats. > Interpret polygrams. > Discuss the use of interpreters in polygraph examinations. > Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the methodology of polygraphy testing with specific reference to Specific outcomes: > Conduct a polygraph examination. Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: > Demonstrate knowledge and application of efficient study skills > Present an informed argument on a current issue in a business sector. > Research ethical and international trends in polygraphy. > Research the origins and use of polygraphy. Comparison with South African Qualification: Interviewing, including pre and post-test interviewing is thoroughly covered in the South African Unit Standards: > Specific Outcome 2: Discuss different interview techniques used in polygraph testing. > Specific Outcome 3: Construct questions for use in polygraph testing. > Specific Outcome 4: Investigate the use of different test formats. > Specific Outcome 2: Interview an examinee or suspect. Synergies with South African Qualification: Comparison with South African Qualification: The Unit Standard demonstrate knowledge and insight into the methodology of polygraphy testing, includes all the skills, including the use of instruments that a polygraph examiner needs to know. These are reinforced in the Unit Standard, Conduct a polygraph examination, which deals with the practical application of the skills. Learners who are competent in the two Unit Standard would be competent in polygraph skills at a greater depth and breadth required in the Arizona training. Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Synergies with South African Qualification: Overall comparison with the Arizona training: Learners who are competent in the National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 will be competent in the polygraph process and related knowledge, skills and competencies at a greater depth and breadth required in the Arizona training. They will have been exposed to attitudes and values aligned to the South African Constitution and an African context and will be aware of issues of diversity that influence polygraph examinations. The Arizona course consists of up to 394 hours of intensive classroom and laboratory study. The South African Qualification requires 1200 hours of notional time that integrates theory and practice. It appears that the South African Qualification covers all aspects included in the Arizona training and has the advantage of being contextualised for an African situation. The major difference relate to the application of outcomes based education, integration of theory and practice and the fact that the Arizona course is designed to insure the graduate will be a competent polygraph examiner, equipped with the knowledge necessary to conduct conclusive polygraph examinations in a professional and ethical manner, while the National Certificate: Polygraphy, NQF Level 5 is an occupational access qualification. The Arizona course is offered in South Africa where learners are required to have a School-Leaving Certificate and the requirements for a Degree are waived. The course teaches a different scoring system, but all aspects of the course are covered in the South African Qualification in greater depth, structure and detail. The South African Qualification also places greater emphasis on research. Conclusions: > At least an associate's degree from an accredited college or university, or written confirmation of qualifications in the State in which the applicant intends to practice, unless a higher level degree is required for licensing in the State in which the applicant intends to practice, in which case the State law shall prevail. > An applicable level of education required by the State and/or country in which the applicant intends to practice and at least two years investigative experience confirmed in writing by the supervisor of the applicant, unless a greater amount of investigative experience is required in the State in which the applicant intends to practice, in which case the greater amount shall prevail; and, all of the following: > Good moral character, documented by professional references. > At least 25 years of age (waiver on case by case basis), unless a State licensing law requires a higher minimum age, in which case the higher age will apply. > A sponsor who is funding the tuition and expenses. |
ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
The National Certificate: Poligraphy, NQF Level 5 articulates horizontally with the following qualifications:
This qualification articulates vertically with the following qualifications: > Criminology. > Forensic Science. > Physiology. > Penology. > Police Science. > Security Risk Management. > Forensic Investigation. > Human Resources. > Psychology. > Law. |
MODERATION OPTIONS |
This Qualification will be internally assessed and externally moderated by a moderator registered by a relevant accredited ETQA or an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the relevant accredited ETQA.
|
CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this qualification was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
NOTES |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARDS: |
ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS | |
Core | 252155 | Analyse the facts and context of an incident in order to make a decision relating to polygraph examinations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 3 |
Core | 252163 | Apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology to polygraph examinations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Core | 252162 | Conduct a polygraph examination | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 252166 | Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the methodology of polygraphy examinations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 15 |
Core | 252147 | Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of human behaviour that has implications for polygraph examinations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 252158 | Research international trends in polygraphy and related ethical issues | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 252165 | Research the origins and use of polygraphy | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Fundamental | 117456 | Conduct an Investigative Interview | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
Fundamental | 15093 | Demonstrate insight into democracy as a form of governance and its implications for a diverse society | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Fundamental | 244570 | Demonstrate knowledge and application of efficient study skills | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Fundamental | 230070 | Present an informed argument on a current issue in a business sector | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 242585 | Analyse the dynamics of different interactive styles in client relationships | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 3 |
Elective | 252026 | Apply a systems approach to decision making | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Elective | 242714 | Apply elementary statistical methods | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 243936 | Apply restorative justice interventions in formal and informal contexts | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Elective | 252031 | Apply the principles and concepts of emotional intelligence to the management of self and others | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
Elective | 242707 | Assimilate and present specialised evidence in a court of law | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Elective | 243264 | Customise an anti-corruption strategy at operational level for a Public Sector Department | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 15096 | Demonstrate an understanding of stress in order to apply strategies to achieve optimal stress levels in personal and work situations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 15094 | Demonstrate insight into the application of theories of Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence in personal development | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 243939 | Demonstrate knowledge of crime prevention within a Victim Empowerment context | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 2 |
Elective | 123483 | Evaluate the effects of counter-xenophobia and non-racism on a work environment | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
Elective | 252021 | Formulate recommendations for a change process | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Elective | 11984 | Give evidence in a court of law | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
Elective | 114226 | Interpret and manage conflicts within the workplace | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Elective | 116488 | Justify disclosure or non-disclosure of information in an ethical framework | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 252040 | Manage the finances of a unit | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Elective | 244254 | Manage the mainstreaming of gender in programmes and projects | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Elective | 12140 | Recruit and select candidates to fill defined positions | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 9 |
Elective | 243940 | Coordinate the development of an information-based crime prevention strategy | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 6 |
Elective | 252156 | Demonstrate knowledge and application of the polygraph examination process as a correctional release and monitoring mechanism | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 3 |
Elective | 252153 | Quality assure a polygraph process | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 3 |
LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
NONE |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |