All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage a learnership/learning programme |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9935 | Manage a learnership/learning programme | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Occupationally-directed ETD Practitioners | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Higher Education and Training | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2000-10-11 | 2003-10-11 | SAQA 0532/00 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2004-10-11 | 2007-10-11 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
15232 | Coordinate planned skills development interventions in an organisation | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A practitioner who has achieved this unit standard will be able to manage and oversee the logistical support for learning programmes/learner ships, either in a single context or across contexts.
This competence will allow practitioners to better manage their own contribution to workplace skills development environments and plans. The competence prepares a practitioner for broader managerial learning and roles. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Practitioners applying to enter a learning programme for this ETD standard -or applying to be assessed against this ETD standard -are assumed to have a qualification or equivalent competence in an occupation in which they will practice this ETD competence.
This standard describes the ETD competence, which will be needed for them to manage learner ships or learning programmes related to their occupational competence. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The following statements provide a general guide to the scope and complexity of the competence expected of a practitioner:
1. Practitioners are required to demonstrate that they can perform the specific outcomes with understanding and reflexivity. However, at this level they will have internalised the "rules" or principles, which inform what they do, and will not longer be operating consciously with such rules. 2. The practitioner is required to demonstrate the competence described in this standard in the context of learning programmes/learner ships. 3. The specific outcomes should be performed in line with an established methodology for managing learner ships/learning programmes. At this level the practitioner should be able to describe two alternative methodologies; to explain how their performance would differ if they used them and to justify their choice of methodology. 4. At this level, practitioners should be able to relate knowledge beyond their occupational and ETD competences to the performance of the ETD competence described in this standard. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Design and develop a management system for a learnership/learning programme. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Design and develop a management system for a learnership/learning programme
by, e.g.: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Co-ordinate the management of a learnership/learning programme. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Co-ordinate the management of a learnership/learning programme by, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Develop plans for the improvement of the management. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Develop plans for the improvement of the management. by, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or will assess this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3. Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. Therefore anyone wishing to be assessed against this unit standard may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The practitioner is able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
1. Applicable legislation, enterprise and occupational policies. 2. Current education and training trends in the enterprise, occupation, sector, and the country as a whole. 3. The nature of the occupational or enterprise system. 4. Principles and practices of quality assurance. 5. Outcomes-based forms of managing learner ships/learning programmes, which are consistent with the aims and objectives of the National Qualifications Framework and Skills Development Strategy. 6. Forms of practice, which promote the values described in the Bill of Rights and the principles underpinning the Employment Equity Act. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage by, e.g.:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information by, e.g.:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by, e.g.:
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 15232, which is "Coordinate planned skills development interventions in an organisation", Level 5, 6 credits.
VALUES The ETD practice outlined in this unit standard should promote the values of affirmation and non-discrimination as described in the Bill of Rights and Employment Equity Act. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 22900 | National Certificate: Environmental Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 13740 | Certificate: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 64649 | Higher Certificate: Early Childhood Development | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 23095 | Higher Education and Training Certificate: Development Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD |
2. | Aldabri 106 Institute for Quality (Pty) Ltd |
3. | Annacol Training Consultants |
4. | ASSESSMENT COLLEGE OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD |
5. | B T Group of Companies Pty Ltd |
6. | BOLAND COLLEGE |
7. | Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd |
8. | Capricorn College for FET |
9. | Caversham Education Institute |
10. | CENTRE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT |
11. | College of Cape Town - Athlone Campus |
12. | CORE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL |
13. | Custoda Trust |
14. | D M Management and Consulting |
15. | Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc |
16. | Damelin |
17. | Damelin Correspondence College (Pty) Ltd |
18. | Directflo |
19. | DM Training Consultants |
20. | Early Learning Foundation Montessori Teacher Training |
21. | Early Learning Resource Unit (ELRU) |
22. | EASTCAPE MIDLANDS COLLEGE BUSINESS UNIT (Uitenhage) (WA) |
23. | EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION INC |
24. | EDUTAK PRE-SCHOOL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT |
25. | FALSE BAY TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING COLLEGE |
26. | Faranang Business and Training Solutions PTY(LTD) |
27. | Goldfields TVET College |
28. | Grassroots Adult Education and Training Trust |
29. | Isibani Skills Academy |
30. | Jabulani Training & Development |
31. | Katiso-kuno Consulting |
32. | Kenako Investments |
33. | Kgaka Kgolo Institute (Pty) Ltd |
34. | KHANIMAMBA TRAINING AND RESOURCE CENTRE |
35. | Klein Karoo Resource Centre |
36. | Learning Performance Link |
37. | Loago Business Consulting |
38. | MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
39. | Marematlou Training Institute |
40. | MASIKHULE EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE |
41. | MATHS CENTRE INCORPORATING SCIENCES |
42. | Matimba Management and Labour cc |
43. | MENTORNET (PTY) LTD |
44. | Montessori Teacher Training Centre South Africa |
45. | Motheo Training Institute Trust |
46. | MWG Logistical Services |
47. | New Beginnings Training and Development Organisation |
48. | Northern Cape Urban College: Kimberley Campus |
49. | Northlink College |
50. | Northshore Trading 19CC t/a Makakhaunye Training and Development Agency |
51. | Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc |
52. | NTI College |
53. | Orbit FET College - Central Office |
54. | Petra institute of Development (PTY) Ltd |
55. | PMA Holding (Pty) Ltd |
56. | PROFESSIONAL CHILD CARE COLLEGE PTY LTD |
57. | Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd |
58. | QPD CONSULTANTS |
59. | Resonance Institute of Learning |
60. | Retshetse Training Project |
61. | Right 4 u College |
62. | SANTS College |
63. | Sigodi Development Services and Associates (SDS) cc |
64. | SKU Training and Assessment |
65. | South Cape Public FET College - George Campus |
66. | Southern African Youth Movement |
67. | Spotru Training Centre |
68. | SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd |
69. | Sustainability Institute Trust |
70. | T Mabuya & Associates (Pty) Ltd |
71. | Teachers Learning Centre (Pty) Ltd |
72. | Tembe Service Providers |
73. | Thabelanang t/a Thabelanang Trading Enterprise |
74. | Thasha Training and Consulting |
75. | The Fundamentals Training Centre |
76. | THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD |
77. | The Institute of People Development |
78. | The Iscariota Group (Pty) Ltd |
79. | The Port Elizabeth Early Learning Centre |
80. | Thembekile training consulting |
81. | THUKAKGALADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT |
82. | Thuto-Botshabelo Training and Projects (Pty) Ltd |
83. | TLHARIHANI TRAINING CENTRE (PTY) LTD |
84. | TMG Quality Services |
85. | Ulwazi Training & Development |
86. | Umzansi Educational Programs Centre |
87. | UNIVERSAL COLLEGE OUTCOMES SA |
88. | Vuselela TVET College |
89. | WEST COAST COLLEGE FET |
90. | WESTERN COLLEGE FOR FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING |
91. | Wildfire Development Training Agency |
92. | WonderKids Academy |
93. | World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |