All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Evaluate the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product by means of pour plate methods |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9164 | Evaluate the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product by means of pour plate methods | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Food | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2004-10-13 | 2006-04-20 | SAQA 0556/04 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2007-04-20 | 2010-04-20 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
123299 | Evaluate the microbiological quality of food products by means of pour plate methods | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | 12 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard is able to:
This unit standard is for anyone who has to determine the microbial load of food or beverage products by means of the total plate count, coliform count, yeasts and moulds count and spore count under laboratory conditions. This unit will contribute to the full development of the learner within the food or beverage manufacturing environment by providing recognition, further mobility and transportability within the field of manufacturing and assembly. The skills, knowledge and understanding demonstrated within this unit standard are essential for social and economic transformation and upliftment within the food or beverage manufacturing and processing environment. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Description of required skills:
Knowledge of introductory food or beverage microbiology. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope of this unit standard is for anyone who has to determine the microbial quality of a food or beverage product for quality control purposes under laboratory conditions.
In the context of this unit standard, pour plate methods include the total plate count, coliform count, yeasts and moulds count and spore count. The level assigned to this unit standard is appropriate because the process requires a range of well-developed skills and offers a significant choice of procedures. Some relevant theoretical knowledge, interpretation of available information, discretion and judgement, as well as a range of known responses to familiar problems are employed. The application of this unit standard is to qualify the person for certification in skilled occupations and sub-trades. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate knowledge of microbiological pour plate methods. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The principles of each of the pour plate methods are explained according to standard microbiological principles |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The explanation refers to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The purpose and importance of pour plate methods as quality control tests on food or beverage products are explained |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The explanation highlights the implication of processing food or beverage products with a high microbial load on final product quality, as well as the financial implications thereof |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Prepare for pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The selection of an aseptic sampling technique is motivated with respect to the purpose of the pour plate methods |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The consequences of selecting and applying a non-aseptic sampling technique are explained in terms of the effect on test results |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Preparation of equipment and personal preparation is done according to standard operating procedures |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Preparations include:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The samples are marked, diluted and maintained in such a way that it meets the requirements for the pour plate methods |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Equipment and reagents for the pour plate methods are prepared according to standard operating procedures |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. The samples for the pour plate methods are prepared according to standard operating procedures |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Perform pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Pour plate methods include the total plate count, coliform count, yeasts and moulds count and spore count. Two (2) samples must be analysed in duplicate for each pour plate method |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The pour plate methods are performed on each sample according to standard operating procedures |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Equipment and reagents are handled according to standard operating procedures and safety requirements |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The microbial quality of each sample is established without error |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Evaluations are carried out in the designated area and according to site schedules, instructions and standard operating procedures |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. The purpose of working in line with site schedules is explained according to standard food or beverage principles |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Samples are evaluated safely, and with the most economic use of time |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. The equipment is left clean and ready for re-use in the designated area |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The work area is left in a safe and clean condition |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
9. Problems are solved within scope of work |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Report on the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Report on the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product in terms of the results of the pour plate methods. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Results are recorded according to standard operating procedures |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The microbiological specifications for the food or beverage product under investigation are identified according to site-specific standards |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The results of the pour plate methods are interpreted and a conclusion is drawn on the microbial quality of the food or beverage product in terms of standard food or beverage principles and site-specific standards |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Deviations from the microbiological specifications for the food or beverage product are explained according to standard food or beverage principles |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. The potential consequences of recording inaccurately are explained according to standard food or beverage principles |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. The purpose of accurate documentation is explained according to standard food or beverage and legislation principles |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge is reflected within the assessment criteria of each specific outcome. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which response displays that responsible decisions, using critical and creative thinking, have been made by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Perform pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Perform pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one`s activities responsibly and effectively by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Prepare for pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Perform pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. Report on the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product in terms of the results of the pour plate methods. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by using mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentations by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Report on the microbiological quality of a food or beverage product in terms of the results of the pour plate methods. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
Evident in the following specific outcome: Perform pour plate methods on a food or beverage product. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large
Evident in all the specific outcomes |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 123299, ''Evaluate the microbiological quality of a food products by means of pour plate methods'', level 3, 12 credits, as soon as 123299 is registered.
1. Legal requirements: The following acts and/or codes, current and future regulations and amendments will be applicable: 2. Definition of terms within this unit standard: Terminology and clarification/ explanation/ definition. Standard operating procedures. Refer to company procedures, prescribed procedures from the manufacturer, personal and food or beverage safety procedures, good manufacturing practices, best practices, applicable legislation, time frames, recipes and specifications. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20212 | National Certificate: Food Laboratory Practices: Dairy Laboratory Analyst | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | FOODBEV |
Elective | 23138 | National Certificate: Food and Beverage Laboratory Practices: Food and Beverage Laboratory Analysis | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-12-04 | Was FOODBEV until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |