SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Analyse and communicate workplace data 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
8662  Analyse and communicate workplace data 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Hospitality,Tourism,Travel, Leisure and Gaming 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 11 - Services Hospitality, Tourism, Travel, Gaming and Leisure 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 
2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
A person assessed as competent against this unit standard will be able to:

Use appropriate forms of tables, graphs, diagrams or charts to analyse and communicate information relating to the work environment.

This competence will equip individuals with the numeracy skills to operate more effectively in their workplace and in their learning. It will contribute to more numerate workplace and learning environments. 

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
A person taking this unit standard is assumed to have acquired the competence described in the standard entitled `Collate, Understand and Communicate Workplace Data (NQF4)`. 

UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in ranges/points beneath each. These are prefaced by "e.g." since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity.


NSB 1:

Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. 

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
Select appropriate forms of tables, graphs, diagrams and charts. 
OUTCOME NOTES 
Select appropriate forms of tables, graphs, diagrams and charts to capture information relevant to a variety of workplace functions. 

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
 

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.

1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.

2. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.

4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge.


NSB 1:

When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.

The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.


Method of assessment:

Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
  • Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
  • Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
  • Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
  • Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
  • Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)


    Integrated assessment:

    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Develop the tables, graphs, diagrams and charts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.

    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.

    2. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.

    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge.


    NSB 1:

    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.


    Method of assessment:

    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
  • Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
  • Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
  • Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
  • Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
  • Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)


    Integrated assessment:

    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Analyse the information to draw relevant conclusions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.

    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.

    2. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.

    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge.


    NSB 1:

    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.


    Method of assessment:

    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
  • Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
  • Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
  • Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
  • Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
  • Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)


    Integrated assessment:

    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Present information using tables, graphs, diagrams and charts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.

    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.

    2. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.

    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge.


    NSB 1:

    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.


    Method of assessment:

    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
  • Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
  • Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
  • Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
  • Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
  • Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)


    Integrated assessment:

    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment. 


  • UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    1. Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.

    2. Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.

    3. Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA`s policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation; in terms of agreements reached around assessment and moderation between ETQA`s (including professional bodies); and in terms of the moderation guideline detailed under point 4 immediately below.

    4. Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies specify otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification.

    Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. 

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The person acquiring this unit standard should be able to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of:

    1. The purpose and nature of a wide variety of graphs, tables, charts and diagrams for analysing and presenting information.

    2. How to use these in analysing and presenting information relevant to the workplace through appropriate means. 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community (relates to all outcomes). 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information (relates to all outcomes). 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively (relates to all outcomes). 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Personal development. 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Supplementary Information:

    Assessment case studies and other supplementary to be developed through the learnership pilots. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Fundamental  35925   Certificate: Fisheries Observation: Deep Sea  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  AgriSETA 
    Fundamental  13740   Certificate: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2003-10-11  Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  13741   Diploma: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2003-10-11  Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  59409   National Certificate: Agricultural Extension  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  AgriSETA 
    Fundamental  49086   National Certificate: Auctioneering Management  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2011-02-16  Was SERVICES until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  48886   National Certificate: Business Advising  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2010-11-11  Was SERVICES until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  48874   National Certificate: Business Consulting Practice (Enterprise Resource Planning)  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  SERVICES 
    Fundamental  24195   National Certificate: Community Conservation: Practice and Co-ordination  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2006-04-09  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  20153   National Certificate: Conservation: Fisheries Resource Management  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2012-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  20416   National Certificate: Conservation: Natural Resource Management: Terrestrial  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2008-03-12  Was CATHSSETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  48855   National Certificate: Emergency Services Operations  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2009-02-18  Was LG SETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  22901   National Certificate: Environmental Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Fundamental  93993   National Certificate: Labour Relations Practice  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  36438   National Certificate: Local Economic Development  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  LG SETA 
    Fundamental  59949   National Certificate: Natural Resource Management: Terrestrial  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  48908   National Certificate: Sanitation Project Co-ordination  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  EWSETA 
    Fundamental  18943   National Certificate: Tourism: Cabin Crew  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2009-01-10  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  63249   National Diploma: Agricultural Extension  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  AgriSETA 
    Fundamental  67692   National Diploma: Coaching Science  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  49469   National Diploma: Complex Procurement  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2012-06-30   
    Fundamental  20613   National Diploma: Event Co-ordination  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  21789   National Diploma: Funeral Services Practice  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  SERVICES 
    Fundamental  20414   National Diploma: Service Management  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  36213   National Diploma: Technical Financial Accounting  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  FASSET 
    Fundamental  13742   Degree: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2003-10-11  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  50419   National Certificate: Port Control and Admissions  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2009-06-29  Was PSETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Elective  48553   National Diploma: Corrections Science  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2020-07-30  SAS SETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. A4 Consultancy Cc 
    2. AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD 
    3. Afroxpert Performance Developement Cc 
    4. Akadon Trading (Pty) Ltd 
    5. All Access Holdings 
    6. Altec Training And Consulting 
    7. Amangile Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    8. Amaqamu Project Management and Consulting 
    9. Amm Training And Consulting 
    10. Apex Education (Pty) Ltd. 
    11. Arden School of Management 
    12. Arete Consulting And Management Services 
    13. Asiphokuhle Training And Research Institute 
    14. Avax Sa 481 Cc. T/A Mandisa Development Services 
    15. Avc Corporate Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd. 
    16. Ayoba Training 
    17. Bakgatla Municipal Solutions 
    18. Bantubanye Skills 
    19. Basiea Development And Training 
    20. Bendrew Trading 
    21. Beso Business Empowerment Solutions Cc 
    22. Bettes - Types Trading And Projects 
    23. Black Bull Consulting 
    24. Boikgantsho Consulting & Events 
    25. Bokamoso Competence (Pty) Ltd 
    26. Bokatoka Construction and Projects 
    27. Bothanda Trading 
    28. Break The Chains Development Services 
    29. Bright Eyes Trading 
    30. Bright Ideas Training 
    31. Bulwa Minerals Pty Ltd 
    32. Camblish Training Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    33. Canton Investments (Pty) Ltd 
    34. Capricon Training Consultants cc 
    35. Cb Willemse Training 
    36. Ccg Systems 
    37. CEDROS DEVELOPMENT AND PROJECTS 
    38. Central Institute of Professional Studies and Services 
    39. City Of Johannesburg Emergency Services Training Academy 
    40. Classic Human Capital Solutions 
    41. Core Training International 
    42. Crack Down Pest Control Services 
    43. Cradle Stars Trading Enterprise 
    44. Cymbol Consulting(Pty) Ltd. 
    45. DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTRE NPC 
    46. Development Bank Of Southern Africa (Dbsa) 
    47. Devine Intelligence Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    48. Ditirelo Skills Development Services 
    49. Ditlou Solutions 
    50. Ditlou Sons And Daughters 
    51. DM Management & Consulting 
    52. Dreamfinders Trading and Projects 588 
    53. Dynamic Abilities General Trading 
    54. E Mali Outsourcing Cc 
    55. Eastern Rose Enterprise 
    56. Eden Training 
    57. Edutel Skills Development Pty Ltd 
    58. Edutraining Business College 
    59. Eduversity Pty Ltd 
    60. Ekurhuleni Metropolitian Municipal Emergency Services Training Academy 
    61. Elvis Koena Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    62. Empowerment Dynamics Consulting 
    63. Ethekwini Municipality Emergency Services Training Department 
    64. Ethembeni Multi Service Enterprise (Pty) Ltd 
    65. Extribyte (Pty) Ltd 
    66. Faith And Jennifer Maintanance And Construction 
    67. Falcon Business Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    68. General Economic Analysis 
    69. Giamanje Tvet College 
    70. Global Care Trading 100 CC 
    71. Gns Training Consultants 
    72. Gotsec Skills Training 
    73. Growth Management Consulting 
    74. Hanyeleni Business Enterprise 
    75. HDPSA 
    76. Heavenly Button Trading Cc 
    77. Heirs Training and Development Pty Ltd 
    78. Higherway Institute of Learning 
    79. HLOGIRATI (PTY) LTD 
    80. Hlombe And Associates 
    81. Hs Global Skills Business Solutions 
    82. Ibless Enterprise 
    83. ICM t/a Institute for Career Management 
    84. Ilinge Labantu Debt Solution 
    85. Ilitha Lelizwe Consulting 
    86. Imithente Development Holdings 
    87. IN TUITION 
    88. Independent Development Trust 
    89. Injeje Training 
    90. Inkazimulo Trading 
    91. Inkcubeko Yakwantu Trading 
    92. Innercity Training Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    93. Innovative Technology Design 
    94. Institute Of Cooperatives And Community Economic Development 
    95. Intermasiko Cc 
    96. Inzalo Enterprise Management Systems (Pty) Ltd 
    97. Jet Energy South Africa 
    98. Josmap Training Institute 
    99. Joubert Park Youth Outreach Project 
    100. Jtm Empowered 
    101. Jumpstart Training Institute 
    102. Kadimo Consulting Cc. 
    103. Kalideen Investment T/A Kalvest 
    104. KALIDEEN MANAGEMENT SERVICES 
    105. Keetileafrika Training Institute 
    106. KG Business Development 
    107. Khehli Institute 
    108. KHOSITHI TRAINING 
    109. Khula Nonke Training & Development 
    110. Kpk Training Solutions 
    111. Ktmo Business Solutions 
    112. Kwem Management Solutions 
    113. Learning Performance Link 
    114. LEGAL EAGLES ACADEMY 
    115. Lekoko Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    116. Lelethu Training (Pty) Ltd 
    117. Letzaa Group 
    118. Limpopo Led Resource Centre 
    119. Local Government Management Academy 
    120. M.I.C. Training And Development 
    121. Maccauvlei Learning Academy Pty Ltd 
    122. Magase And Shakong Projects 
    123. Magnico Products (Pty) Ltd 
    124. Magumzane Traiding Cc 
    125. Mahlasedi Training Matters 
    126. Makhophila Training 
    127. Mamuhle Academy 
    128. Mancosa (PTY) LTD T/A Management College of Southern Africa 
    129. MANCOSA Pty (Ltd) 
    130. Marcado Human Resources Strategies 
    131. Masemase Consultancy Cc. 
    132. Mashphe Logistics Services 
    133. MASM Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd 
    134. Mathaveiya Skills Enhancement 
    135. Mbedvula Trust 
    136. Mbonyolosi Skills Development Institute 
    137. Mc Intosh Xaba And Associates (Mxa) 
    138. Mcbee Consulting Pty Ltd 
    139. MENTORNET PTY LTD 
    140. Meyiswa Training Academy 
    141. MGM Training & Consulting 
    142. Mgwezane Training And Events Management Cc. 
    143. Miczo'S Enterprise 
    144. Mimoisa Business Solutions Cc 
    145. Mintirho Development Services 
    146. Mission Point Consulting 
    147. Mj Mafunisa Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    148. Mma Maru Pty Ltd 
    149. Mml Consulting Cc. 
    150. Mohlaje Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    151. Mortarboard Training Solutions 
    152. MTHENGENYA & ASSOCIATES 
    153. Mudau Picture Framers 
    154. Muhangwene Development Enterprise 
    155. Multi-Skills Training & Development Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    156. Multiple Productive Management Solutions 
    157. Nedtex73 
    158. Nells Skills Academy 
    159. Nghano Training And Development Centre 
    160. Nonunu Projects 
    161. Northlink College - Wingfield Campus 
    162. Ns Global Academy 
    163. Nsuku Management Consultants 
    164. NTI College 
    165. Omithombo Management Academy 
    166. Osolwazi Further Education And Training 
    167. Panafrican Supply Chain Academy 
    168. Peo Training Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    169. Petra Institute of Development 
    170. Pfim Trading (Pty) Ltd 
    171. PHETHA PROFFESSIONAL SERVICES CC 
    172. Phetho Concepts (Pty) Ltd 
    173. Pioneer Business Consulting 
    174. Pma Holdings (Pty ) Ltd. 
    175. Powernexus 
    176. Princetop Corporative Training (Pty) Ltd 
    177. Progressive School Of Business And Engineering (Pty) 
    178. Ptdev (Pty) Ltd 
    179. Qeda Higher Training Institute 
    180. Quick Leap Investment 
    181. R&M Enterprises Pty Ltd 
    182. Ratomac Trading Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    183. Reflections Development Institute 
    184. Regen Institute of Leadership and Management Education 
    185. Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School 
    186. Resonance Institute of Learning 
    187. Rural Metro Emergency Management Services (Pty)Ltd 
    188. Rustenburg Emergency And Disaster Management Services Training Academy 
    189. Sa Business Services Cc. 
    190. Sabela Trading And Projects Cc. 
    191. Sazm Trading And Projects 
    192. Senelo Trading Cc 
    193. Setaki Trading And Projects (Pty) Ltd 
    194. Sf Consulting Engineers 
    195. Shekinah Deep Excellence (Pty) Ltd 
    196. Shirs Vision Compleadev (Pty) Ltd 
    197. Simangasentso Enterprise 
    198. Sithole ithuba Community Development 
    199. Siza Nesu Training And Consultants 
    200. Sol Plaatje Emergency Services Training 
    201. Solstice Networks Cc. 
    202. Sonani Skills 
    203. South African Institute of Learning (SAIL) 
    204. South West Gauteng TVET College 
    205. Spectrium 
    206. St Kings Institute Of Technology And Business Studies 
    207. Summat Training Institute 
    208. Swaranang Management Consulting Cc 
    209. Talent Emporium Academy (PTY) Ltd 
    210. The Institute of People Development 
    211. Thinking Mind Trading 
    212. Thobologo Training And Education Group 
    213. Thopasefoka Consulting Pty Ltd 
    214. Thubelihle Graduate Institute 
    215. Thuto-Boswa Education And Training Solution 
    216. Tinotel Communications 
    217. Tlokwe City Council Fire Brigade Services Training Centre 
    218. Tlotlangthuto Training & Consulting 
    219. Tloumogale Business Development & Consulting 
    220. Training At Work (Pty) Ltd 
    221. Transafric Consulting Pty Ltd 
    222. Tsebong Training Centre 
    223. Tshamutengu General Trading Cc. 
    224. Tshepang Consulting & Project 
    225. Tshisimani Holdings (Pty) Ltd. 
    226. Tshwane Training Institute (Pty) Ltd. 
    227. Tswelopele Rural Development Network 
    228. Tumpu Trading And Projects 
    229. Twin Peak Technologies 
    230. Uan Projects 
    231. Ulwazi Training Development 
    232. Umqondo Business College 
    233. Umzansi Educational Programs Centre 
    234. University Of Business Excellence(Pty)Ltd 
    235. University of Fort Hare 
    236. University of the Western Cape 
    237. University of Venda 
    238. Ursivox Interactive Systems 
    239. Vantage Training 
    240. VERYCOOLIDEAS 
    241. VEZOKUHLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 
    242. Vicmat Consultants 
    243. VSL General Trading 
    244. Vumilia Africa Group 
    245. Vuselela FET College - Klerksdorp Campus 
    246. Waoesi 
    247. WEINVEST INVESTMENT CC 
    248. Wildlife and Enviroment Society of South Africa 
    249. Ya Hina Management Consulting And Projects 
    250. Yamangcuse Consulting 
    251. Zamaubuhle Training 
    252. Zealot Business College 
    253. Zizamele Business Enterprise 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.