SAQA

All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE:

Evaluate own facilitation performance

SAQA US ID	UNIT STANDARD TITLE
7388	Evaluate own facilitation performance
ORIGINATOR
SGB ABET Educators
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-
FIELD			SUBFIELD
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development			Adult Learning
ABET BAND	UNIT STANDARD TYPE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	CREDITS
Undefined	Regular	Level 4	NQF Level 04	8
REGISTRATION STATUS		REGISTRATION START DATE	REGISTRATION END DATE	SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"		2018-07-01	2023-06-30	SAQA 06120/18
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT		LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30		2027-06-30

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard.

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD

Persons credited with this unit standard are able to reflect critically on their own performance as a learning facilitator with a view to improving personal competence and practice, also to report in broad terms on the progress of a learning group.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1

Evaluate a learning event

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Feedback on learning event is sought from learners in the form of open-ended questions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Learner feedback is synthesised into a few valid points.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Relatively successful and unsuccessful aspects of a learning event are identified.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

4. Actual outcomes of the event are compared to planned outcomes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

5. Plausible reasons are given for relative success / failure of the event.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6

6. Feedback from learners and own reflection is formulated into resolutions about future learning events.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2

Evaluate own facilitation over a number of learning events

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. A relatively successful learning event, or incident within an event, is identified and a plausible explanation offered.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. A relatively unsuccessful learning event, or incident within an event, is identified and a plausible explanation offered.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Relatively strong or weak aspects of own facilitation are identified.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

4. Aspects of work where progress has been made are identified.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

5. Own learning and development needs and areas for self-improvement are identified.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6

6. Resolutions are formulated to build on own strengths or address own development needs.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7

7. Assistance and advice is sought from a senior practitioner or supervisor when necessary.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3

Report on progress of learning group

OUTCOME NOTES

Special note: Reports may be oral or written according to local requirements.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Reports are produced at intervals according to organisational requirements.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Reports accurately indicate progress made and difficulties encountered.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Exceptionally high incidents of absenteeism and dropout are recorded and plausible explanations offered.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

4. Reports contain adequate detail according to organisational requirements.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

5. Reports are formatted according to organisational requirements.

Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO):

UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING

Identifying and solving problems in which responses display those responsible decisions, using critical and creative thinking have been made.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING

Organising and managing oneself and one's actions responsibly and effectively.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING

Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING

Demonstrating and understanding of the world as a set of related system by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.

REREGISTRATION HISTORY

As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015.

UNIT STANDARD NOTES

This unit standard does not qualify the practitioner with formal or theoretical evaluation skills. It essentially encourages simple and honest reflection on own facilitation for the purpose of improving own practice.

QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD:

	ID	QUALIFICATION TITLE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	STATUS	END DATE	PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
Core	20838	National Certificate: ABET Practice	Level 4	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Core	20159	National Diploma: ABET Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2020-07-30	ETDP SETA
Core	20483	National Higher Certificate: ABET Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Core	20485	National First Degree: ABET Practice	Level 6	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2018-12-31	ETDP SETA

PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD:

This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.

1.	African Learing and Development Academy for Adults ALDAA
2.	African Learning & Development Academy (Pty) Ltd (ALDA)
3.	Amaqamu Project Management and Consulting
4.	ATS Institute
5.	B T Group of Companies Pty Ltd
6.	CURMO Designs (Pty) Ltd Co
7.	D M Management and Consulting
8.	Faranang Business and Training Solutions PTY(LTD)
9.	Guru Group of Learning (Pty) Ltd
10.	Hlengana Sibiya Training and Associates cc
11.	HOPE ACADEMIC AND SKILL CENTRE
12.	Igugu Training and Investments
13.	INKWENKWEZI PRIVATE COLLEGE - SKILLS DEVELOPMENT cc
14.	KITSO TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
15.	Lebzatainment Foundation NPC
16.	MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD
17.	Mafamawethu Consultants
18.	Mlamuli M Connect (Pty) Ltd
19.	MVIMBI BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
20.	MWG Logistical Services
21.	Nomoyi Skills Development
22.	Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc
23.	NTI College
24.	OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT
25.	PC Educational Holdings Pty Ltd
26.	Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd
27.	Project Literacy
28.	QPD CONSULTANTS
29.	Reflections Development Institute
30.	Regenesys Management (Pty) Ltd
31.	Resonance Institute of Learning
32.	Retshetse Training Project
33.	SEOPOSENGOE TRAINING CONSULTANCY CC
34.	South Cape Public FET College - George Campus
35.	The Finishing College (Pty) Lt
36.	The Fundamentals Training Centre
37.	Thembekile training consulting
38.	Thuto-Botshabelo Training and Projects (Pty) Ltd
39.	TSHIROLOGO DISABILITY TRAINING SERVICES PTY TLD
40.	Ulwazi Training & Development
41.	Unathi Training
42.	Ungaphelamandla Consultancy Private College (PTY) LTD
43.	World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd