All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Optimise manufacturing and production processes |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
377001 | Optimise manufacturing and production processes | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | 24 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard replaces: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
119166 | Optimise manufacturing processes | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 24 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Learners credited with this standard will appreciate the importance of optimising manufacturing and production processes by identifying areas for improvement and taking the necessary measures to effect changes. They will be able to identify and solve problems that impede improvement in the manufacturing and/or production environments, using various problem-solving techniques. Once they institute interventions they would need to monitor and evaluate the extent of improvement and take necessary steps to deal with any further problems.
Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
This Unit Standard can be used in both manufacturing and production environments. Optimising means to continuously improve the efficiency of the processes within the manufacturing and production plants. It also means developing skills, using resources effectively and reducing overall costs. It requires testing the boundaries of the known and finding new ways of creating and effecting improvement. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Collect and analyse data and identify opportunities for improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Sources where data can be found are identified and checked for relevance in terms of the specific process and sector involved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sources include but are not limited to historical records, customer complaints, machine process data/records, product data, product specification, test results, workgroup reports, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The data is analysed using appropriate analysis techniques and trends are identified from the analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Techniques include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Opportunities for improving manufacturing or production processes are identified using the analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Problems preventing/impeding the improvement of manufacturing or production processes are identified and elaborated through the analytical process. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify the root cause of the problem. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The problem is anything that prevents or impedes the optimisation of a process and is seen as an area requiring improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The problem is defined and explained with reference to the impact thereof on the manufacturing or production environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The problem is examined and identified in terms of problem type, problem parameters and problem components. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Possible causes of the problem are listed and analysed in accordance with specified requirements within the manufacturing or production environment to determine the root cause of the problem. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The root cause is analysed/researched and facts gathered are analysed to determine their relevance to the problem. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Gathered facts must also include, where appropriate, verification, current standards (organisational, national and international) and best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The present and desired states are defined so that the difference between them forms the basis for further understanding of the problem. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Criteria defining the desired state are analysed so that the way to solve the problem becomes clearer. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Solve the problem and generate improvement options. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Problem-solving techniques and/or tools appropriate to the nature of the problem are selected and analysed to ensure that consideration has been given to the available problem-solving tools. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Problem solving techniques must include, but are not limited to brainstorming, mapping, observation, questionnaires, experiments and consultation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The problem-solving techniques and/or tools are applied considering the criteria for the desired state. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Hypothesising is undertaken to identify tentative solutions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Factors influencing the problem situation are analysed so that the solution(s) is/are seen in a broader perspective and would therefore require a comprehensive solution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Solutions or options are generated so that a comprehensive picture emerges of the range of possibilities. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Solutions or options are researched, analysed and discussed with relevant personnel in order to obtain expert input. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The advantages and disadvantages of the various possible solutions or options are analysed for rating against weighted criteria. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Implement solution or option to achieve improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The solution or option is simulated, trialled and tested, where possible, to ensure efficacy of the solution or option. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The solutions or options are examined in terms of their cost implications and potential savings. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A plan is developed for the implementation of the solution or option to achieve improvement or optimisation in an area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The plan includes, but is not limited to the following:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The improvement plan is motivated to line management and adjusted as per management's input. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A project team is constituted to manage the implementation of the improvement plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The resources required are prepared and responsibilities allocated to selected individuals to ensure successful implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Negotiations with other departments are conducted and efforts between departments are coordinated to ensure efficiency in implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Communication with all relevant parties is conducted precisely to ensure constructive participation in the implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The improvement plan is implemented according to agreed upon schedule. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the improvement plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Data is collected, organised and stored as per workplace requirements and procedure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Data is assessed for accuracy and interpreted to identify deviations, opportunities and problem areas. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Improvements or knock-on effects from interventions are identified and evaluated to determine success and identify trends. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Interventions result in a series of incremental improvements. Evidence of several continuous improvements over a period of 3 - 4 months should be produced. Incremental improvements can be small but need to be sustainable and verifiable. If an intervention did not achieve the desired change but was based on a plausible hypothesis, this should still be regarded as valid evidence since it at least establishes directions which may not yield results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
All aspects of the implementation is documented and recorded according to workplace procedure so that evaluation can be accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation includes but is not limited to the development of plans, instructions, budgets, proposals; updating of procedures and work instructions; communication documents. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The health and safety of the individuals in the workplace and of the environment is maintained during implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Standards are adjusted and updated in accordance with workplace procedure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Standards include but are not limited to operating procedures, formulations or recipes, settings, training materials, protocols, ordering information. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
A report on the improvements is prepared and submitted to appropriate authority. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Improvements include but are not limited to operational and financial improvements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Continuous improvement issues are discussed with the workgroup and other partners. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names and functions of:
Purpose of: Attributes, descriptions, characteristics and properties: Processes and events: Causes and effects, implications of: Procedures and techniques: Sensory cues: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: Theory: rules, principles, laws: Categories: Relationships, systems: |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, community to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsively and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that the problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when identifying areas for improvement to optimise every aspect of the entire manufacturing process. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard replaces unit standard 119166, "Optimise manufacturing processes", Level 5, 24 credits. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 79627 | National Certificate: Mechatronics | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2015-06-30 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |