All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage and communicate requirements |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
259278 | Manage and communicate requirements | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Computer Sciences and Information Systems | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Information Technology and Computer Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will enable learners to manage conflicts and changes to requirements and ensure that all stakeholders and the project team remain in agreement on the solution scope.
A learner credited with this unit standard will be able to: Range: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Ensure that changes to project work products are agreed by all stakeholders and documented. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Project work products include but are not limited to project plans, business case, and solution and requirements specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Formal and informal changes to requirements are approved and documented to ensure that all stakeholder needs are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documented includes but is not limited to change request forms, product variance request. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Conflicts and issues with requirements are highlighted and resolved to ensure that consensus is reached between all stakeholders regarding the most appropriate solution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Changes to requirements are prioritised in order to allow the selection or design and development of the most appropriate solution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Multiple versions of requirements work products are maintained to ensure that changes can be traced in accordance with change control procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Maintain relationships between components to trace requirement changes and update relevant documentation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The relationships between the various requirements components are maintained to ensure that there is consistency between the components. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Impact analysis is performed when changes are requested to ensure that the plan can be updated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Impact analysis information is produced to ensure that agreed changes are included in the process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Support activities are undertaken to ensure that the solution assessment and validation includes the changed requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Support activities include but are not limited to allocation of changed requirements. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Maintain requirements for re-use. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The requirements to be maintained are selected after solution implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Name the responsible party who will maintain the requirements (i.e. custodian, librarian). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The responsible party is identified to. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Facilitate ongoing use of requirements for impact analysis and solution maintenance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Facilitate re-use of requirements on related projects to encourage enterprise consistency of business models. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Prepare a requirements package. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Use the agreed requirements and business communication plan to determine the requirements package. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Determine appropriate format for requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Appropriate format includes but is not limited to use-case narrative, system requirements specification document, user stories. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Create a requirements package. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Requirements package includes but is not limited to executive summary, formal documentation, request for information (RFI), request for proposal (RFP). |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Communicate requirements and changes to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The requirements package and business communication plan are used to communicate with all stakeholders in the appropriate manner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Interaction with stakeholders takes place before, during and after the project to ensure that they are informed and take part in decision making. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Each activity in the business analysis process involves communication on different levels. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Interaction with solution team to assure that requirements are correctly understood and implemented. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
All requirements are communicated with and understood by all parties involved in the project. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively through:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and articulation of:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science, technology and indigenous knowledge effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others through:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 63909 | National Certificate: Business Analysis | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MICTS |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Atvance Institute (Pty) Ltd |
2. | BEE Clinic Pty Ltd |
3. | Clean Heat Academy |
4. | DC Academy (PTY)LTD |
5. | Epitome Villa (Pty)Ltd |
6. | EYETHU NATIONAL COMPUTER COLLEGE PTY LTD |
7. | FACULTY TRAINING INSTITUTE PTY LTD |
8. | Finweb Business Consultancy |
9. | HAVOHEJ CONSULTANCY |
10. | HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY |
11. | IT Academy |
12. | K Boneng Consulting Services P |
13. | Metanoia Ratings PTY LTD |
14. | MINDWORX CONSULTING GAUTENG PTY LTD |
15. | Mpande Technologies cc |
16. | Mufuka Business and Technical |
17. | On the Ball College Pty ltd |
18. | OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT |
19. | Polokwane Technology Institute (Pty) Ltd |
20. | QUALITATIVE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS |
21. | Sisekelo Sustainability Institute |
22. | SUPREME ICT CONSULTANTS |
23. | Terry Computer Services cc |
24. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
25. | VUTHLARI MARKETING CONSULTING |
26. | Woosh Consultants (Pty) Ltd |
27. | YITRO INNOVATIONS |
28. | ZA WIT (PTY) LTD |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |