All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate understanding of spatial modeling in GISc |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
258764 | Demonstrate understanding of spatial modeling in GISc | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Geographical Information Sciences | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Physical Planning, Design and Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard has been developed for the GIS occupational area and is intended for persons who aim to achieve career advancement by gaining GIS skills leading to qualification based on unit standards. A person who has successfully completed this unit standard will have a basic understanding of spatial modeling with GIS.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners are already competent in terms of the following outcomes or areas of learning when starting to learn towards this unit standard:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the role of models in science. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The nature of science is explained in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Meta-science, science, theory, models, laws, hypotheses, observations, facts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The nature of scientific explanation is understood in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Deductive, inductive, genetic, functional. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Uses of models in science are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Characteristics of models are explained in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Selective, structured, suggestive, approximations, analogies, re-applicable. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Functions of models are explained in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Psychological, acquisitive, organizational, fertile, logical, normative, systematic, constructional, cognitive. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Definition of a model is correctly formulated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Advantages of using models are listed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the nature of different types of spatial models. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Different criteria for classification of models are listed in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Comprehensiveness, structure, theoretical foundations, modeling techniques. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different classifications of models are presented in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Scale (physical/iconic & analogue), conceptual (diagrammatic), mathematical (deterministic & probabilistic), Temporal (Steady state (Static)/Transient (Dynamic), Spatial (Dimensionality: Lumped (0-D), Distributed (1-D Linear, 2-D Planar, 3-D Solid)), Integrated: Spatial-temporal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Examples of different types of model are given in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Physical systems (Geomorphology, meteorology/climatology, hydrology); Socio-economic systems (Demography, sociology, economics, urban/settlements, industrial location, agricultural); Mixed/Integrated systems (Regions, organisms, eco-systems, diffusion, networks). |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Understand how to construct a spatial model. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The principles of model development are described in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Parsimony, modesty, accuracy, testability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The steps in spatial model building are explained in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Problem identification, conceptualization (hypothesising/postulating), mathematical formulation/coding, data gathering, estimation/calibration, validation, application. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The pit-falls in model development are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The level of integration with GIS is specified and motivated in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Isolated, loosely coupled, tightly coupled, fully integrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The data structure of the spatial model is specified and motivated in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Stock matrix, interaction matrix, network, list, raster. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
A simple model flow chart is produced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The GIS is selected and choice motivated in the context of the range statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Data structure, functionality, modularity, interoperability. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate the ability to use an existing spatial model in GIS. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The purpose of the selected model is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The required data to run the model are loaded into the GIS. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The required parameters for running the model are entered. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The model is successfully activated and executed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The required results of the model are generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The results of the spatial model are interpreted correctly. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Essential embedded knowledge is dealt with under the specific outcomes section where "Demonstrate Knowledge and Understanding" is required. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Solve problems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team/group/organisation or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, organise and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematics and language skills in the modes of oral and written presentations. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically (showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others). |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Display an understanding of the world as a set of related systems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full development of each learner and the social and economic development of society at large. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Fundamental | 63689 | Bachelor of Arts: Geographical Information Science | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-06-30 |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |