SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Apply technical knowledge and skill in order to manage risk in engineering losses 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
14985  Apply technical knowledge and skill in order to manage risk in engineering losses 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Financial Services 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies Finance, Economics and Accounting 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 4  NQF Level 04  8 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Registered" 		 2003-10-08  2006-10-08  SAQA 0150/03 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2007-10-08   2010-10-08  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard is replaced by: 
US ID Unit Standard Title Pre-2009 NQF Level NQF Level Credits Replacement Status
242684  Apply technical knowledge and skill in order to manage risk in engineering losses  Level 4  NQF Level 04  8   

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This Unit Standard is intended for learners who manage asset risk in insurance and other organisations. It will be useful for underwriters, risk managers, brokers and people in short term insurance.

The qualifying learner is capable of:
  • Explaining what is meant by quality in engineering practice.
  • Explaining engineering risks associated with engineering practice failure.
  • Applying technical knowledge and skill in order to manage maintenance risk.
  • Applying technical knowledge and skill in order to manage construction risk.
  • Applying technical knowledge and skill in order o manage risk in operational processes. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    There is open access to this Unit Standard. Learners should be competent in Communication and Mathematical and Financial Literacy at NQF Level 3. 

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    The typical scope of this Unit Standard is:
  • Other engineering risks include, but are not limited to, electricity breakdown, liability, accidental damage, difference in conditions and deterioration in stock. 
    		•

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Explain what is meant by quality in engineering practice. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. The qualities of good engineering practices are explained with reference to design. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. The qualities of good engineering practices are explained with reference to codes and standards. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. The qualities of good engineering practices are explained with reference to materials. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. The qualities of good engineering practices are explained with reference to engineering practices. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Explain engineering risks associated with engineering practice failure. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Risks associated with construction or engineering are identified and an indication is given of the potential impact and type of cover available for each risk. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Risks associated with an organisation's operational processes are identified and an indication is given of possible control measures for each risk. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Risks associated with machinery breakdown and maintenance are identified and an indication is given of the potential impact and possible control measures for each risk. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. Risks associated with other engineering risks are identified and an indication is given of possible control measures for each risk. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Apply technical knowledge and skill to manage maintenance risk. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Potential risks in maintenance are identified for three operational situations. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. The risk is quantified in terms of probability and severity. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Possible control measures are suggested for three scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. A decision is made to deal with the financial aspects of the risk for three different scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Contingency plans to manage the loss are proposed for three operational situations. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Apply technical knowledge and skill to manage construction risk. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Potential risks in construction are identified for three operational situations. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. The risk is quantified in terms of probability and severity. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Possible control measures are suggested for three scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. A decision is made to deal with the financial aspects of the risk for three different scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Contingency plans to manage the loss are proposed for three operational situations. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Apply technical knowledge and skill to manage risk in operational processes. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Potential risks in operational processes are identified for three operational situations. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. The risk is quantified in terms of probability and severity. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Possible control measures are suggested for three scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. A decision is made to deal with the financial aspects of the risk for three different scenarios. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Contingency plans to manage the loss are proposed for three operational situations. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    Training Quality Assurance Body, through summative and formative assessment by a registered assessor.
  • Assessors must be registered as an Assessor with the INSQA or with an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the INSQA.
  • Moderators must be registered as assessors with INSQA, or with an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Agreement with INSQA.
  • Training providers must be accredited by the relevant ETQA.

    Moderation should include both internal and external moderation where applicable. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Learners are capable of identifying and solving problems in which responses show that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made in identifying potential engineering risks at a specific organisation and proposing options for managing the risk for a particular operation. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Learners are capable of collecting, organising and critically evaluating information in conducting an engineering risk audit. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Learners are capable of communicating effectively in analysing and quantifying the engineering risk at an operation and proposing control measures. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Learners are capable of seeing the world as a set of related systems proposing solutions to manage engineering risk. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 242684, which is ' Apply technical knowledge and skill in order to manage risk in engineering losses ', Level 4, 8 Credits. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  24396   National Certificate: Risk Management  Level 4  NQF Level 04  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered"     		 2006-10-08  Was INSETA until Last Date for Achievement 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.