All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Apply the principles of Computer Programming |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
14910 | Apply the principles of Computer Programming | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Information Systems and Technology | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Information Technology and Computer Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular-Fundamental | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is intended:
People credited with this unit standard are able to: The performance of all elements is to a standard that allows for further learning in this area. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Open.
The credit value of this unit is based on a person having the prior knowledge and skills to: |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Operate computer programming development tools. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Editor, Syntax checking, Compiling. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The operation demonstrates the use of the editor of the development tools to produce program source code. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Any editor chosen by the learner, applying to programming language used. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The operation includes the use of the syntax checker of the tools to check for syntax errors. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Any editor chosen by the learner, applying to programming language used. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The operation uses the tool to compile the program source code produced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
User written code, standard functions, library functions. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of different data representations used in computer programs. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The demonstration applies different number conversion techniques between data types (at least 2). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Binary, Decimal, Hexadecimal, Octal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The demonstration compares different logical data types (at least 3) in a language of choice (incl. pseudo code). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Numeric, Alphabetic, Alpha numeric, Boolean. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The demonstration differentiate between different internal representations of data types (in ASCII). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Signed numbers, Floating point numbers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The demonstration distinguishes between different logical operators (at least 2). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
And, Or, Not . |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Demonstrate an understanding of fundamental programming principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The demonstration illustrates the differences between the various algorithmic structures of programming languages, using a language of choice (incl. Pseudo code). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sequential, Selection, Loops. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The demonstration compares good & bad program documentation principles (at least 3), using a language of choice (incl. Pseudo code) where needed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
General readability, Meaningful variable names, indentation, program comments. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The demonstration illustrates good programming quality assurance principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Syntax check, Test data & Test plan. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate an understanding of high level programming language concepts. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
High level language of choice or Structured use of language (Pseudo code) |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The demonstration explains what is understood by constants and variables. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Constants maintain fixed values; Variables have changing values. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The demonstration illustrates the concepts of operators and expressions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Arithmetic operators (+ - * / ), Logical operators (= <> ), execution sequence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The demonstration illustrates different modular programming features and variable passing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Standard functions, Procedures without variables, Global and Local variables. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The demonstration applies different debugging techniques. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Trace tables, Appropriate test data, Structured walk-through's. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The relevant Education and Training Quality Authoriy (ETQA) must accredit providers before they can offer programs of education and training assessed against unit standards.
Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
1. Performance of all elements is to be carried out in accordance with organisation standards and procedures, unless otherwise stated. Organisation standards and procedures may cover: quality assurance, documentation, security, communication, health and safety, and personal behaviour. An example of the standards expected is the standards found in ISO 9000 Certified Organisations.
2. Performance of all elements complies with the laws of South Africa, especially with regard to copyright, privacy, health and safety, and consumer rights. 3. All activities must comply with any policies, procedures and requirements of the organisations involved, the ethical codes of relevant professional bodies and any relevant legislative and/ or regulatory requirements 4. Performance of all elements is to be completed within the normal range of time and cost that would be expected in a professional environment (eg. In a commercial or government organisation). 5. Performance of all elements should be performed with a solid understanding of the use of development tools needed in the areas applicable to the unit standard. Examples of such tools are, but are not limited to CASE tools, programming language editors with syntax checking, program source version control systems. 6. Performance of all elements should make use of International capability models used for Software Development. Examples of such models include (but are not limited to) the ISO SPICE model as well as the CMM model for Software Development. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify, solve problems and make decisions in relation to the current systems development environments. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage him/her self and his/her activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise, and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and or language skills in the modes of oral and/ or written persuasion when engaging with systems development. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exists in isolation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to his/her full personal development and the social and economic development of the society at large by being aware of the importance of: reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively, exploring education and career opportunities and developing entrepreneurial opportunities. |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Supplementary information: ?
Sub-Sub-Field (Domain) :Systems Development. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49627 | Further Education and Training Certificate: e Records Management | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | |
Core | 24294 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Information Technology: Systems Development | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2010-01-23 | Was MICTS until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 78965 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Information Technology: Systems Development | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MICTS |
Elective | 20185 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Banking | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | BANKSETA |
Elective | 63589 | National Diploma: Geographical Information Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AAR Trading and Projects (Pty) Ltd |
2. | Advanced Assessments and Training (Pty) Ltd |
3. | Affirmations Training |
4. | Africa Glory Empowerment Services |
5. | Africa Learn (Pty) Ltd |
6. | Assured Vocational Skills Institute (Pty) Ltd |
7. | ATTI Nelspruit Pty Ltd |
8. | Balefile Trading and Services |
9. | Brainwave Project 707 Pty Ltd |
10. | Brainwave Projects 1430 cc |
11. | Brainwave Projects 707 |
12. | Clean Heat Academy |
13. | Columbus Consulting Pty Ltd |
14. | Compuscan Academy |
15. | CSL Accountants |
16. | CTU Training Solutions |
17. | DC Academy |
18. | Delmas Development Centre |
19. | ED-U Options Academy |
20. | Epitome Villa (Pty)Ltd |
21. | EYETHU NATIONAL COMPUTER COLLEGE PTY LTD |
22. | Fachs Business Consulting and Training |
23. | Finweb Business Consultancy |
24. | Foster-Melliar (Pty) Ltd |
25. | Futurekids SA (Fochville) |
26. | Gigimo Tourism Academy |
27. | Global Institute for Capacity |
28. | HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY |
29. | Hlanganani ICT (Pty) Ltd |
30. | HUAWEI Technologies Africa (PTY) LTD |
31. | Ikusasalethu Youth Development Project NPC |
32. | Information Technology Resource Centre |
33. | Jeppe College of Commerce and |
34. | LETAGO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING |
35. | LIMPOPO COMPUTER COLLEGE BK |
36. | Loomee Group |
37. | Makhophila Training |
38. | Malope It Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
39. | MAT 007 (PTY) LTD |
40. | Matibidi Raphela Investments (Pty) LTD |
41. | MBOWA COLLEGE PTY LTD |
42. | Metanoia Ratings PTY LTD |
43. | MMELA VILLAGE TECHNOLOGIES (PT |
44. | Mogapi Education Group (Pty) Ltd |
45. | Moving Ahead Development Agenc |
46. | Mufuka Business and Technical |
47. | NBC Technologies |
48. | NCC - Vereeniging |
49. | Nolwazi Stem Education for The |
50. | Ntandokazi Holdings Pty Ltd |
51. | Octomate Education Pty Ltd |
52. | Octopus Training Solutions |
53. | Olrich Home of Technology |
54. | On the Ball College Pty ltd |
55. | OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT |
56. | Polokwane Technology Institute (Pty) Ltd |
57. | Pretoria Technical College |
58. | Production Management Institute of Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd |
59. | Progressive School of Business |
60. | Prophesy Training College (Pty) Ltd |
61. | QUALITATIVE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS |
62. | RIAPHATHUTSHEDZA |
63. | Richfield Graduate Institute of Technology Pty Ltd |
64. | Rostec Technical FET College (Pty) Ltd |
65. | Sabile Human Resources Consult |
66. | SIGNA ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
67. | Sinovuyolethu Trading (Pty) Ltd |
68. | Spears Business and Life Couch Consulting (Pty) Ltd |
69. | SUCCESS BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL CC |
70. | SUPREME ICT CONSULTANTS |
71. | Terry Computer Services cc |
72. | THE SHERQ CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PTY LTD |
73. | Think Tank T2 (Pty) Ltd |
74. | Titan Trade Technologies |
75. | TORQUE TECHNICAL COMPUTER TRAINING PTY LTD |
76. | TSP COLLEGE |
77. | Ukwazi Academy and Corporate S |
78. | Varsity Institute of Science & Technology (Pty)Ltd |
79. | Visionary Skill Academy |
80. | VSS College (Pty) LTD |
81. | VUTHLARI MARKETING CONSULTING |
82. | Wellinkwise Pty Ltd |
83. | Whitestone College |
84. | Xylo Trading 12 (Pty) Ltd |
85. | YITRO INNOVATIONS |
86. | Zikode Development Trust |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |