All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Plan, design and manage a maintenance programme for social housing |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
117736 | Plan, design and manage a maintenance programme for social housing | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Real Estate | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 11 - Services | Cleaning, Domestic, Hiring, Property and Rescue Services | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2004-12-02 | 2007-12-02 | SAQA 1357/04 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2008-12-02 | 2011-12-02 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will be useful for people who are employed as Property Managers or fulfil a property management function in a social housing institution. Such people will need to set up both routine and preventive maintenance and quality management systems and ensure that relevant staff such as maintenance staff, housing supervisors and service providers carry out their functions in terms of these systems. Resident satisfaction with maintenance provision is an underlying element of this unit standard.
The learner who has achieved this unit standard is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner will have a sound knowledge of property management, procurement procedures, social housing principles and procedures, and an understanding of the relationships between the quality of the product, customer satisfaction and financial risk in the social housing context. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Social housing includes rental and co-operative housing. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate the knowledge required to manage a maintenance programme. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The operation of all major physical systems in a range of social housing building types is described and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Building types includes high-rise, low rise apartment complexes, duplex, single dwellings and any others that might typically be found in social housing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The common maintenance requirements of all major physical systems in social housing buildings are identified and described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Detailed technical or engineering knowledge is not required. Maintenance requirements should include routine and preventive maintenance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The relationships between the quality of the product, customer satisfaction and financial risk in the social housing context are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Manage the contracting of service providers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Concepts such as service level agreements, performance management quality control and accountability management are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Procedures for the effective and accountable contracting of service providers are developed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Standard or pro forma contract forms that meet company and legislative requirements as well as allow for performance management and quality control are developed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Manage the financial efficiency of a maintenance programme. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The concept of financial efficiency in relation to routine and preventive maintenance is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Financial efficiency includes, for example, minimising expenditure, maximising returns on expenditure, maximising cost recovery from residents, preventing overcharging or double charging, cost efficient replacement and repair procedures, use of quality products for long-term cost efficiency. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Systems for ensuring financial efficiency in routine and preventive maintenance programmes are developed and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Systems can be electronic or manual or a combination of these. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Implementation of the system is monitored, evaluated and adjusted accordingly. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Develop and manage a system for routine maintenance. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Routine maintenance includes day-to-day repair work and is most often minor work, but can include major works. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A system, taking into account suitable authority levels, for reporting, assessing, responding appropriately to and authorising payment on maintenance-related issues is developed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A quality management system suitable for routine maintenance services provided by external service providers or in-house maintenance staff as applicable is developed according to best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A system to ensure units are ready for new residents on time is developed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
This system needs to include requirements of staff in the leasing department and take account of the contextual pressures experienced at month-end periods in the buildings. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Implementation of the system is monitored, evaluated and adjusted accordingly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A procedure for developing adequate technical skills and knowledge of procedures of appropriate staff is developed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Develop and manage a system for preventive maintenance. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Preventive maintenance includes systematically planned work (pro-active) and is more often large-scale or major work, but can include minor work. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A system of periodic building inspections intended to identify and plan preventive maintenance work is developed according to best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A quality management system suitable for preventive maintenance services provided by external service providers or in-house maintenance staff as applicable is developed according to best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Implementation of the system is monitored, evaluated and adjusted accordingly. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Knowledge considered to be critical evidence of competence is included in the assessment criteria explicitly, or can be inferred by performance. This includes knowledge on:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems by using critical and creative thinking by, e.g., managing the financial efficiency of a maintenance programme according to the assessment criteria for specific outcome: " Manage the financial efficiency of a maintenance programme ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team by, e.g., acting as member and leader of a maintenance team according to the assessment criteria for specific outcomes: " Manage the contracting of service providers " to " Develop and manage a system for routine maintenance ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by, e.g., developing and managing a system for routine maintenance according to the assessment criteria for specific outcome: " Develop and manage a system for routine maintenance ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information by, e.g., assessing information relating to setting up maintenance programmes in a social housing institution according to assessment criterion: " A system, taking into account suitable authority levels, for reporting, assessing, responding appropriately to and authorising payment on maintenance-related issues is developed ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by, e.g., managing maintenance staff or service providers according to the assessment criteria for specific outcomes: " Manage the contracting of service providers " to " Develop and manage a system for routine maintenance ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically setting up maintenance systems according to assessment criterion: " Systems for ensuring financial efficiency in routine and preventive maintenance programmes are developed and explained
Range: Systems can be electronic or manual or a combination of these ". |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by, e.g., explaining the interrelatedness between physical quality of buildings, customer satisfaction and financial risk in social housing according to assessment criterion: " The relationships between the quality of the product, customer satisfaction and financial risk in the social housing context are explained ". |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49198 | National Certificate: Social Housing Property Management | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Elective | 58246 | Bachelor of Human Settlements Development | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-06-30 |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |