All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Control problem animals |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116402 | Control problem animals | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Qualifying learners are capable of identifying predators eroding farm animals, distinguishing, selecting and demonstrating various control practices and measures and applying appropriate post control practices.
In addition they will be well positioned to extend their learning and practice into other areas of agriculture and especially the animal production field and the small stock industry. Learners will gain specific knowledge and skills in the small stock industry and will be able to operate in an animal production environment implementing sustainable and economically viable production principles. They will be capacitated to gain access to the mainstream agricultural sector, in animal production, impacting directly on the sustainability of the sub-sector. The improvement in production technology will also have a direct impact on the improvement of agricultural productivity of the sector. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will demonstrate competence against the unit standards or equivalent:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Whilst range statements have been defined generically to include as wide a set of alternatives as possible, all range statements should be interpreted within the specific context of application.
Range statements are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify the natural behaviour of problem animals causing erosion. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Problem animals include but are not limited to lynx/caracul, jackal, hyena, leopards, otters, badgers, various birds and reptiles as relevant to the context of operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Terrain and habitat of various problem animals are identified and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different spoors/tracks of various problem animals are described and identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Excretions/dung of various problem animals are recognised and identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Calling behaviour of various problem animals are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Feeding patterns of various problem animals are observed and identified. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Distinguish between various control practices applied to problem animals causing erosion on farms. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Control practices include but are not limited to snares, poison, trapping, culling, capture and other as relevant to the context of operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Various control practices are explained and demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Advantages and disadvantages of various control practices are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Application of control practices are described and demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Legislation regulating the control of problem animals is stated and explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Selection of the relevant control practices for controlling various problem animals causing erosion on farms. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Control practices include but are not limited to snares, poison, trapping, and calling, capture physical and other as relevant to the context of operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Control practices and procedures are evaluated and selected according to the problem animal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The selected control practice and procedures are applied correctly under supervision. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Control practices and procedures are implemented according to legislation and considering environmental issues. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify post control practices of problem animals. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Control practices include but are not limited to snares, poison, trapping, and calling, capture physical and other as relevant to the context of operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Problem animals retrieved after control practices are correctly identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Animals retrieved after implementing the relevant control practices, are evaluated by weighing and sexing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Problem animals retrieved are evaluated for general health or abnormalities. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Pregnancy, number of foetuses, stomach content. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
All animals retrieved are disposed of appropriately. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Skin, teeth, taxidermy and other. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Adapt control practices based on post control findings when appropriate. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment, formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations etc. The assessment should ensure that al the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and cannot be assessed only by being observed. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The person is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem Solving: relates to specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-management: relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Interpreting Information: relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication: relates to specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use Science and Technology: relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
World as related system: relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Self-development: relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 48979 | National Certificate: Animal Production | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Elective | 49011 | National Diploma: Animal Production | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Balemi Consulting Pty Ltd |
2. | Boikgantsho Consulting & Events |
3. | Cedara College of Agriculture |
4. | Heedmorine Training |
5. | Leruo ke Matla Training and Enterprise Development Services |
6. | Maishamalema Development Training |
7. | Mananthatshema Skills Dev. Centre |
8. | Matotomana Training & General Trading |
9. | Morwa Agri-development cc |
10. | Mvelo Consultant |
11. | National Woolgrowers Of South Africa |
12. | Resource Consulting Services (PTY) Ltd |
13. | Sekhukhune FET College - Central Office |
14. | Selipha Trading (Pty) Ltd |
15. | Setlakala Business Development |
16. | Suidwes Beleggings Eiendoms Beperk |
17. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
18. | TPN Training and Recruitment cc |
19. | Tripple R Training Provider |
20. | Vari Holdings (Pty)Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |