All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage water quality parameters |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116322 | Manage water quality parameters | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 3 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A learner will be able to implement corrective actions based on water quality parameters. In addition they will be well positioned to extend their learning and practice into other areas of agriculture and water management.
Learners will gain specific knowledge and skills in maintaining water quality and will be able to operate in an animal production environment implementing sustainable and economically viable production principles. They will be capacitated to gain access to the mainstream agricultural sector, in animal production, impacting directly on the sustainability of the sub-sector. The improvement in production technology will also have a direct impact on the improvement of agricultural productivity of the sector. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will show competence against the following unit standards or equivalent:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Range statements are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Correctly assess, analyze and evaluate water quality data and independentlydecide on the corrective actions within operational technical systems to well defined, but possibly unfamiliar problems. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
This will include:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A thorough understanding of the effects of certain physical factors is demonstrated and is related and applied as a standard procedure or a corrective action to relevant plant or animal species. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A thorough understanding of the effects of certain chemical factors is related to and applied as a standard procedure or a corrective action to relevant plant or animal species. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A thorough understanding of the effects of certain microbiological characteristics is related to and applied as a standard procedure or a corrective action to relevant plant or animal species. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A thorough understanding of the effects of certain biological processes is related to and applied as a standard procedure or a corrective action to relevant plant or animal species. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A thorough knowledge and understanding of the principles and use of operational technical systems is related, integrated and applied as a standard procedure or a corrective action to relevant plant or animal species. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the reasons, impacts and implications of specific corrective actions related to water quality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A wide range of scholastic and technical concepts related to water and all its aspects is recalled. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
An analysis of collected data or information and the reasons for specific corrective actions are explained and presented. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Information, especially within the context of corrective actions is independently accessed, analyzed and evaluated. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Implement corrective actions related to the quality of water and water quality systems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Water quality and processing systems are explained and described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Quality management systems, as related to water quality are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Quality in existing implemented water quality assurance systems is maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Water quality and processing systems, ensuring water quality and integrity is maintained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Evaluate the effects of corrective actions or adjustments on the water quality requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The implementation of corrective actions or adjustments on water quality, supply and integrity is evaluated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Further adjustments or adaptations to water supply and quality management systems are proposed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Water quality management systems are in place and reported on continuously. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment, formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and cannot be assessed only by being observed. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The person is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self Management: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Interpreting information: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Science and Technology: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The world as a set: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Self-development: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 48979 | National Certificate: Animal Production | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Core | 49009 | National Certificate: Plant Production | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Balemi Consulting Pty Ltd |
2. | Boikgantsho Consulting & Events |
3. | Cedara College of Agriculture |
4. | ELSENBURG AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE |
5. | Heedmorine Training |
6. | KayDee Project Management Cc |
7. | Leruo ke Matla Training and Enterprise Development Services |
8. | Maishamalema Development Training |
9. | Mananthatshema Skills Dev. Centre |
10. | Matotomana Training & General Trading |
11. | Mogaladi Business Enterprise |
12. | Morwa Agri-development cc |
13. | Mthashana FET College - Vryheid Campus |
14. | Mvelo Consultant |
15. | National Institute For The Deaf - NID |
16. | Resource Consulting Services (PTY) Ltd |
17. | Sekhukhune FET College - Central Office |
18. | Selipha Trading (Pty) Ltd |
19. | Setlakala Business Development |
20. | Suidwes Beleggings Eiendoms Beperk |
21. | Temothuo Group |
22. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
23. | TPN Training and Recruitment cc |
24. | Tripple R Training Provider |
25. | Vari Holdings (Pty)Ltd |
26. | Westco Agri Training |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |